By: Richard Bennett
Yeah, all that Milton Friedman dude ever did was <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1976/" rel="nofollow">win the stinkin' Nobel Prize in economics</a>, which...
View ArticleBy: Robert Feinman
I’m not going to get into a Milton Friedman discussion, except to note a couple of minor points. 1. The economics “Nobel” prize is, in fact, not a Nobel Prize, but a misnamed prize given by a Swedish...
View ArticleBy: Staten Island guy
Jeff, you should know better. Yes, NYC is duly considered a Democrat stronghold, but that does not, in any way, make it a “liberal” city. It hasn’t been remotely such since “Flop Sweat” David Dinkins...
View ArticleBy: CaptiousNut
Which came first the chicken or the egg on Sulzberger’s face? Every word of that socialist rag is propaganda. Incredibly, here they’ve taken to spin their spin.
View ArticleBy: Delia
I agree with Robert (on the general idea) — academia wondering off from the objectivity goal is even scarier than the press doing that (maybe we need to deal with ideology the same why we deal with...
View ArticleBy: Hasan Jafri
Ha! Jeff, it’s interesting it took The University of Chicago, of all the bastions of “conservative thought” to contrive this argument. “Newspaper slant” is an oxymoron like “military intelligence.”...
View ArticleBy: Andy Freeman
Actually, the study only found that media use the terminology favored by its readership.
View ArticleBy: CaptiousNut
Yeah Freeman. And the terminology is not favored by those who used to be part of the readership.
View ArticleBy: Robert Feinman
The study makes the fundamental logical fallacy of inferring that coincidence implies causality. One can just as easily draw the conclusion that readers go to those media outlets which support their...
View ArticleBy: California Conservative » Are Newspapers Politically Biased?
[...] Buzzmachine has more. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
View ArticleBy: thunderbolt fan
Most of the NYers I know who read the Post do it for a laugh-- you know, Page Six, Peyser rants, Weekly World News worthy headlines, etc. They read the NY Times for the news and the Post for a chuckle.
View ArticleBy: thunderbolt fan
Most of the NYers I know who read the Post do so for a laugh-- you know, Page Six, Peyser rants, Weekly World News worthy headlines, etc. They read the NY Times for the news and the Post for a chuckle.
View ArticleBy: FreeElectron
The author fails to appreciate that in many American cities, there is only one major newspaper. I live near St Louis and must subscribe to three other, daily newspapers to get a balanced view of the...
View ArticleBy: Jersey Exile
The “chuckle factor” should not be discounted at all — my father, a liberal-leaning union rep, watches Fox News almost exclusively to get his news on television. Why? Because by raising his hackles...
View ArticleBy: Oscarphone
They go where the news is accurate. The reason Fox rises in the ratings is because the left hollers about it so much that it catches the interest of normally non-Fox viewers. They go there, find that...
View Article
